 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2007 December
2006 September
2006 January
2005 December
2005 May
2005 January
2004 December
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
|
| I Can't Believe It's Been Over a Year |
| 12.11.07 (5:31 pm) [edit] |
|
My last blog entry was over a year ago! I can't believe it. My life is busy -- that's for sure! -- but I didn't realize that time had gone by so quickly. I may not even have any readers anymore.
But just in case I do...
Here is an exercise for you to try. As Christmas approaches, I began to look at the story of Jesus' birth from the perspective of Matthew's Gospel. Starting with Matthew, chapter 1, verses 18-25 (Matt. 1:18-25), I thought I would try an experiment. I looked in the text for what is called a chiastic structure (a chiasm).
A chiasm takes its name from the Greek letter X (chi), and a text will employ the chiastic structure by using parallel concepts that, when charted, look like the left side of the letter X.
[snooze.....]
Here are two chiasms I came up with for Matt. 1:18-25:
Ignatius’ Chiasm
18 A birth of Jesus Christ
B His mother Mary was pledged to be married
C she was found to be with child
20 D an angel of the Lord appeared...and said
WHAT IS CONCEIVED IN HER IS FROM THE HOLY SPIRIT.
21 SHE WILL GIVE BIRTH TO A SON, AND YOU ARE TO GIVE HIM THE NAME JESUS,
BECAUSE HE WILL SAVE HIS PEOPLE FROM THEIR SINS.
22 D’ to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet
23 C’ virgin shall be with child
24 B’ took Mary home as his wife
25 A’ birth to a son
Ignatius' Alternate Chiasm
18 A before they came together, she was found to be with child
19 B he had in mind to divorce her
20 C After he considered this, an angel...appeared...in a dream
20 D what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit
SHE WILL GIVE BIRTH TO A SON,
21 E AND YOU ARE TO GIVE HIM THE NAME JESUS,
BECAUSE HE WILL SAVE HIS PEOPLE FROM THEIR SINS
23 D’ The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son
24 C’ When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel...commanded him
24 B’ took Mary home as his wife
25 A’ he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son
What do you think? The point, of course, is to see what the unifying thought is in the middle. In both cases, I came up with practically the same affirmation.
If you decide to try it, let me know what you come up with.
Thanks.
[Note: I tried to an "edit" on these chisams to see if I could display them properly, but...I couldn't. It'll take some extra effort on your part to read them. If you decide to do so...thanks.]
|
|
|
| |
| Prayer and Evil |
| 09.18.06 (10:42 am) [edit] |
|
A friend asked me today whether it is all right to pray for the judgment of God to fall on people who do evil. I think he had in mind people who promote, plan, and execute terrorist activity.
The idea of praying for God's judgment on others, no matter who they are, is fraught with hazard. To begin with, when one wishes harm on another, one has descended to the realms of evil himself. To pray "against" someone else may be simply another form of retaliation, and retaliation only escalates the conflict.
The Christian Bible is peppered with statements like that of Paul in Romans 12:17, "Repay no one evil for evil," or that of Jesus in Matthew 5:44, "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."
Besides, it seems to me that we must remember that evil is not only "out there" in other people but that it is also "in here," in me. Until I face evil in myself, I may always be inclined to project it on to others and try to eradicate it by (gulp!) eradicating them. When that happens, it would seem to me that I am myself possessed of evil.
Here's another thought: I wonder how I have colluded in evil that oppresses others to the point that they feel compelled to destroy me. I may think of them as evil because their chosen form of violence seems more -- well, more "violent" -- but what kind of unthinking violence do I perpetrate on others by, say, my consumption of natural resources, my arrogant political views, my prejudice, my self-absorbed lifestyle, and so forth?
Maybe my prayers should be prayers of repentance for the evil that I inflict on others unawares.
When Gandhi and MLK set out to combat evil in their respective contexts, they realized that their methods would have to reflect a higher standard than the methods of those who opposed them. Their use of nonviolent, direct action was compelling and effective. Had they taken up arms -- or prayed for the destruction of their "enemies" -- might their cause have failed because it was infected by the evil it sought to remove?
Once I invite hate to take root in my heart, it seems reasonable that it will only grow. Love may seem ineffective in the face of evil, but, be that as it may, love will not foster evil.
|
|
|
| |
| Meditation/Review of Day |
| 01.21.06 (9:21 am) [edit] |
|
Go ahead. Try it. It's not as easy as you may think. I sat today for twelve minutes, trying to concentrate on my breath. In, out, one; in, out, two, and so forth. Before I knew it, my mind had trailed off onto other things. Of course, when I realized that my mind was wandering, I would bring it back to the breath, trying not to judge myself but feeling, honestly, like I might never be good at this. I am such a novice. (There goes that judgment again! And again.)
Review of the Day (20 January 2006/Friday)
Yesterday was very busy. At one time, reviewing some work I had done, I caught an omission. I wanted to blame someone else. "Why can't I have better help?" I thought. Then I realized that the responsibility was mine. That was, no doubt, a helpful step, but then I blamed myself. Blame -- who is it in me that wants to assign blame? Could we talk?
I remember at one point that a co-worker came into the room. I tend to be warm and friendly with everyone, but I feel false with this man. I know that he is openly critical of me (except when I am around), and I am his supervisor. I have been accused of not holding him accountable for inappropriate patterns he displays, and I know that, soon, I will be asked to comment on his behavior. I feel all sorts of tension inside about this. I don't want to see him get hurt, but, at the same time, I know that he is the source of pain for others. What is the wise course in this? Why am I not responding with confidence to this difficulty?
|
|
|
| |
| A Dream |
| 01.18.06 (5:55 pm) [edit] |
|
A dream: I am at the home of an older woman named Jane, a respected member of our church (not in waking life, only in this dream). There are several people gathered at the house to console Jane because of the death of her long time friend and house mate.
I try to engage someone in conversation about the matter, but I cannot get much response from anyone. I wander around the house a bit, asking over and over, “How’s Jane?” I can’t get anyone to tell me. I then walk into the central room of the house. There, lying on a bed in the middle of the room, is Jane, crying inconsolably, and, next to her on the bed, is the corpse of the woman who has died. I somehow know that the dead woman had nothing of her own but that Jane shared all her belongings with this woman. I do not know how to comfort Jane, and I feel helpless and unnecessary.
Reflection
Associations -- (1) The house -- Nothing in particular comes to mind when I think about the house in my dream. It is like many large, older houses I have been in -- once glorious but now showing signs of age. Impermanence comes to mind.
(2) The crowd -- Again, this is a nondescript group of people. I don’t recall feeling that I knew anyone in particular, and they certainly didn’t seem to know me (or how important and helpful I could be!). Their indifference to me prompted my feeling of being unnecessary.
(3) The “unnecessary” feeling -- I came home late last night from a Finance Committee meeting, in which the theme was, “Year by year, we’re approving budgets that are beyond our means. One of these years, it’s going to catch up with us.” I had a vague feeling that, if I were not around, my successor could come on board at a lower salary, and balance could be restored. I didn’t feel so much unnecessary as I did burdensome.
(4) The corpse -- This recently deceased older woman has no name in the dream, but I have the sense (in the dream) that I know her.
(5) Jane -- In the dream, Jane is an older woman, a close friend and benefactor to the deceased. Interestingly, my wife is sometimes mistakenly called “Jane.” I’m not sure whether there is a connection here. Not to get ahead of myself, but I am thinking that these two older women may likely represent some quality of my inner feminine (anima). One association I may make is this: Last night, as I was leaving the church, a small group was just breaking up. In the group was L. R., an older woman whose sister, Jean (sounds almost like Jane) has Alzheimer’s and is dying.
(6) Inconsolable grief -- In the dream, Jane was weeping uncontrollably, her loss was so painful. I am wondering what losses I am dealing with. Of course, J. D., our associate, is in the process of leaving. (Sunday was his last official day with us.) I realize that I am going to miss the feedback he provided me. Also, I talked with a member of a search committee last night before going to bed and asked that he committee no longer consider me. That was a kind of loss. Another association that comes to mind is that I see myself as being at my best in grief situations. Maybe I’m not all that great! I certainly wasn’t very important in this dream.
(7) Death -- I am not infrequently around death, but I have not had anyone close to me die recently. I am thinking that the death in the dream has to do with a transformation in my inner life. Some aspect of my internal world may be undergoing transformation (death and, hopefully, rebirth).
(8) Age -- In the dream, I am particularly aware of the age of the house, the deceased, and the woman named Jane. They are all old. I am, of course, approaching old age, and I have lot of ambivalence about it. To push the matter just a bit, I am thinking that my fear of aging may suggest a fear of death.
Dynamics -- (1) Being in Jane’s house -- The house in which the dream is set is not my house. I am making a call. Like many others there, I am a guest. Since the house is old (and since the dream comes from within me), I wonder if aging is something I am unwilling to own. “Old age is for old people, and I do not belong in it.”
(2) Death -- A woman lies dead in the dream. I wonder what in me has died or needs to die or may soon die. As I mentioned, an important relationship has come or is coming to an end soon; or, if it doesn’t actually end, it will certainly be modified (by distance, infrequency of contact, and lack of customary intensity). But that may not be the whole picture. Over the last few years, I have descended deeper and deeper into an awareness of how inconsequential (and how impermanent) I actually am. Maybe what is dying is my inflated ego.
(3) Inconsolable grief -- Jane is weeping and will accept comfort from no one. What does this mean if I take Jane to represent something within me? Perhaps it is that I am unwilling to be consoled in my grief over necessary losses. Maybe I am still in denial about the changes taking place in my life.
(4) A feeling of being unnecessary -- Feeling useless and being uncertain about what to do in settings like the one in the dream is not a strange experience for me. It has happened often in my external life. I am not sure that it is the right response to the death of whatever is passing away in me. It may be symptomatic of emerging despair (ala Erikson’s final developmental conflict of integrity v. despair). Perhaps, what I need to do is consider how to meet my end with integrity (wholeness).
(5) Jane as benefactor -- In the dream, I am somehow aware that the deceased has had a patron in Jane. Jane invited her into her home, took care of her, and treated her like a sister. What could this mean? Is it that the dream image of inconsolable grief is a beneficent signal to me? Could it be saying, “Hey! Death has come/is coming in various guises. Prepare yourself to meet it with integrity.”
Central Message -- What is this dream saying to me? It may be saying that death is a part of life, whether it’s the “little death” of a changing relationship, the figurative death of “letting go” of one stage of life to embrace another or even of letting go of personal aspirations that didn’t pan out (I thought I was indispensable, but I am not), or, ultimately, actual, physical demise.
But that’s not the total message of the dream. I think that I am being asked to respond in some way. And my response may be to begin to develop healthy ways of acknowledging and grieving my losses. I don’t want to wind up in what Erikson called despair; I want to finish with integrity (wholeness) whether its at the end of life’s journey or at the end of any of the many cycles of life along the way.
|
|
|
| |
| Two Dreams |
| 01.11.06 (11:30 am) [edit] |
Two dreams: In the first dream, I am working at a coffee shop, something like a Starbucks. Only, this shop is like an unused barn out in the country. In the first part of the dream, I join the crew on a walk in the woods. As we start out, I notice that a large structure, a building, dominates the near horizon. I comment on how big it is. As we return, we approach the "barn," our shop, and I notice how large it seems. In the second part of the dream, we arrive back inside the shop/barn, and there are some new crew members. One of them, a young man, complains about having to work in such a primitive place as this, and another one of the new crew members, a young woman (I think), concurs. I speak up in defense of the shop and its original crew, saying, “Did you know that one of our crew members is from Manhattan? You can't get more sophisticated than that!” Next, I am leaving the shop/barn alone, and I notice some customers beginning to arrive. They are from the nearby upscale neighborhood. I notice, in particular, a woman in a striking business suit. She seems quite elegant, and I think to myself what a high class clientele the shop has. With that thought, I continue to walk away. In the second dream, I am at home. While at the dinner table, I receive a phone call from a parishioner whom I have been counseling. He has had some destructive behavior problems in the past, but lately he has been on top of things. Soon after I hang up, I return to the table, and the phone rings again. I consider not answering it, but the ringing persists. I check the caller ID, and I see that it is another counselor who has been working with my parishioner. I answer the phone, apologizing for taking so long to do so. The counselor says, “Name [withheld] is at it again, isn‚t he?” suggesting that the parishioner has succumbed once more to his addictive behavior. I defend the parishioner, saying that I believe he is doing better and has been exercising control over his behavior.
Reflection
I am not sure where these dreams are coming from. The only association I can think of with regard to the first dream (the coffee shop) is that my son has worked for Starbucks off and on for the past few years. I myself do not even drink coffee.
One possible connection is that my wife told me just last night about a conversation of which she had been a part that day. The incident involved two members of our congregation who were being highly critical of our church. I became mildly anxious at hearing this and thought we might lose these members.
Another possible association has to do with our staff meeting yesterday, in which I learned that each member of the staff is demoralized and feels criticized and unappreciated.
The second dream is directly connected to my experience in working with a man I know who is having problems with addictive behavior. It has been several weeks, however, since I have talked with him at any length, although I did see him and briefly exchange greetings a few days ago. This man has had a few relapses, and I would not be shocked if I learned that he has had another one (although the stakes are very high for him).
I guess what I’m wondering is what my unconscious wants to tell me through these two dreams. I notice that the common factor in both dreams is my effort to defend those who are being criticized -- in the first instance, the coffee shop and its crew, and, in the second, the man whose counselor accused him of relapse.
So, is it that I am feeling the need to defend my church staff, my church, and this one parishioner? I will need to reflect on this further.
|
|
|
| |
| A Dream Fragment |
| 01.09.06 (9:51 am) [edit] |
I am working through an interactive book on spirituality, and the instructions say to choose a text from "your tradition's treasure chest." The book offers a sample, which comes from an aboriginal source -- something about, if a woman offends a man, she may ask his forgiveness, but even if he gives it, she now has no reason to go on living. There is even an illustration in the book, a photograph of a colorful mask that looks like a baboon head. The picture gives the experience a “primitive” tone. In the dream, I feel more resonance with the texts from other traditions than I do with those from my own.
Reflection
This dream is more “cerebral” than most dreams I remember. I do spend a lot of time reading, and spirituality is one of the subjects about which I enjoy reading. I have a number of so-called “interactive” books, books that are not meant just to be read but rather to be worked through. However, I have never really had the discipline to “work through” any of the books.
One of the books, however, that I have is David Feinstein and Stanley Krippner’s The Mythic Path. And there is an exercise in it that comes to mind as I relfect on this dream. It has to do with identifying “underlying mythic conflict,” that is, becoming aware when a guiding myth is “no longer an ally.”
I don’t know that that is what my feelings in the dream are suggesting, those feelings that I am drawn more to the texts of other traditions than to those of my own. But it may be worth exploring.
I am puzzled by the focus of the primitive text on a woman’s offense. If I take the matter inward and consider the feminine principle within my psyche, I usually think that I have in some way offended my anima. Why would I be dreaming about women offending men?
I do recall reading recently in Robert A. Johnson’s book, Lying with the Heavenly Woman, that “the mother complex,” that interior dynamic that urges us toward regression and dependency, is especially antagonistic to health and growth. My “mother complex” arises often, I think, in connection with my sense of being vulnerable, helpless, and unworthwhile.
That is the only connection I can make at this time regarding the content of the passage I am reading in the dream.
The dream on the whole may be inviting me into a more deliberate course with the books I have collected that are meant not only to be read but to be experienced.
|
|
|
| |
| Two Dreams |
| 01.05.06 (8:46 am) [edit] |
[Today is the Twelfth Day of Christmas, which makes tonight Twelfth Night. Tomorrow, January 6, will be the day of Epiphany.]
Again last night, just before going to sleep, I asked for a dream that I could remember. I was given two. I am very thankful.
In the first dream, I am traveling in the car with my wife. We are somewhere, it seems, in the central part of the state, and we are trying to get back home (in the northern part of the state). We have a discussion about the best route, and the options she presents would take us out of the way. To one suggestion I say, “That would mean going south to go north.” I accede to the other suggestion, that we go via a large city far to the north, although I know that that, too, will make the trip longer.
We drive into town and arrive at the bus station. Once inside, I say, “C-- [my daughter] will get home before we do,” suggesting, I guess, that, if she takes the bus, she will arrive home ahead of us. (Busses, of course, are notoriously slow.) Up until now, I have not been aware of our daughter’s presence with us, and, even after this, it does not seem to figure in a large way. My wife seems to be concerned that I am suggesting that our daughter not travel with us, and I tell her that I am only joking.
We go through a glass door to the driveway of the bus station. A small number of people have just arrived and are getting off a bus. I recognize a child, a little girl from our daughter’s childhood, and I call her by name. (She is still a child.) She responds to me by holding out a Santa doll and saying, “Santa’s tail is broken.” I look at the doll, and there does seem to be some damage to it. I say in an attempt to be comforting, “Yes, Santa does seem to be broken.”
Just then, I see the child’s mother in the distance. I cannot remember her name, but I acknowledge her. She is not unfriendly, but neither is she especially warm. She is busy and somewhat frazzled, trying to gather her things.
In the second dream, I am a woman! There is in the dream a young black family whose little boy is very sick. Despite this, he is quite active and resists going to the hospital. There are two episodes in the dream -- one at the child’s house and the other in the car at the hospital.
When I arrive at the boy’s house, his parents and others have been trying to catch him, while he is running around in an effort to elude them. I recognize immediately what is going on, and when he runs near me, I reach out and grab him by a bit of clothing. He is surprised and seems to have been unaware that I was in the house. I hold him by the shirt until his mother can get to him.
To my surprise, the first thing she does is take off his pants. I say, “If he hadn’t had those on, I couldn’t have caught him.”
We are now at the hospital, and all of us are trying to get the child out of the back seat. Again, he resists. I say as I reach out to him, “Come on. Let’s go.” He looks at me and, with resoluteness, says, “No.”
I then notice that, at his feet is a cylinder-shaped plastic container, about the size of a medium-sized waste basket. At the bottom of the container is a ring, a toy ring I think. The little boy wants it, although his parents say he can’t have it -- I am guessing because he is being so uncooperative. I say, “No, let him have it, and I reach into the container to get it for him.” End of dream.
Reflection
Clearly, both of these dreams feature children, one a little girl and the other a little boy. Both children are in a situation of need. One wants help in addressing the need (the broken Santa doll), and the other (the little boy who needs medical attention) resists help.
I am not sure about the gender roles in these dreams -- why one child is a girl and the other a boy, or even why in the second dream I have the sense of being a woman. This may signify some anima work that I need to do. I certainly can see some disconnects between me and the women in the first dream. I am in mild tension with my wife about which direction to take home. I am barely aware of my daughter’s presence. And I cannot remember the name of the child’s mother.
In any case, my intention in both dreams is to be nurturing and attentive to the children in need. This could relate to what some writers call “the inner child,” and, if so, my inner child may need some nurture and attention.
The first dream, of course, has the material about trying to find the best way home. Interestingly, I am firm at first -- about going south to go north -- but, then, I acquiesce and agree to go too far north. I am not sure why we go to the bus station. It is there that I see the little girl who needs help with her doll. That may be reason enough.
Note: It has taken about an forty-five minutes (7:50 - 8:35 a.m.) to record and reflect on these dreams.
|
|
|
| |
| A Dream |
| 01.04.06 (10:05 am) [edit] |
Last night, as I lay on my pillow, I asked for a dream that I would be able to remember. I had had a pretty stressful day, much of the stress occasioned by three events. The first was lunch with a friend and fellow worker. During our conversation at the table, my friend began to say that he could foresee a power play in the work place in which I would eventually lose my job. I was greatly shaken by his remarks and somewhat despondent and anxious the rest of the day.
The second event was a meeting with another colleague shortly after lunch in which he predicted a great deal of trouble for the office in the future, again due to the alignment of power.
Until I had these two conversations, I had been thinking that things would work out for me at the job. I had even exited one job search process. But I had in my email inbox a request for a telephone interview with a prospective employer I talked with once before. The request was for last night.
I wrote back and said yes, I would like to talk. During the interview, I presented myself well, but, after about forty-five minutes, one member of the committee said there was a question that was plaguing the group. Would it work, he asked, for me to leave a larger situation with a larger income for a smaller situation with a smaller income? Could they afford me?
I told them that that was a question with which I was struggling and that I would need more time. They agreed, and the task for me now is to determine whether I can be happy with less money.
I talked with my wife about all three incidents, and, while I couldn’t read her very well, I am guessing that she is distressed about the prospect of moving to a place where we would have less income. (I am not even sure we could meet our obligations on the amount offered.)
So, this was the situation as I went to bed last night. I asked for a dream, and I got one. It came in two parts.
In the first part of the dream, I am at some sort of event with people I do not know. I am not even sure what kind of gathering it is. It takes place in a residence, and there are, maybe, fifty people present, scattered throughout the house. There is food available for grazing, and I have eaten and placed my dishes on a table near me.
Then there is a song. It has movements with it, and, while I am vaguely aware of how to engage the movements, I imitate a couple near me (a man and a woman, presumably married) who seem to make the movements very well. I am aware that, when we sing, “I stir,” we are all to make a stirring movement with our hands. When we sing, “I wave,” we are to wave with our hands. The couple near me appear very graceful in their motions, and I wonder whether I am graceful. I doubt it; in fact, I am slightly put off by the song, even though I am willing to participate. Finally, we sing, “I stand up,” and, of course, I stand up with everyone else. While standing, we are to spin, and, again, I do not feel as graceful as the others.
Then, when the song is over, there is to be a toast, and some form of beverage is being served. I do not have a glass. I notice that others are using their bowls for glasses. Someone (the man in the couple I have been imitating) has discarded a bit of trash into my bowl, which is on the small table to my side. I think about using it anyway, but then I decide to leave the event.
This is where the second part of the dream begins. I am traveling (by auto?) through a city (my home town) to join my wife, but I do not know where she is. I see a star in the night sky and decide to advance toward it. I am aware of traffic and other people, but I seem to move with ease -- even though I don’t know where I am going.
Presently, I am afoot and walking outside a building. I am very intrigued by it and walk around to the back of the structure, where there is an alley entrance. The address is 1215, and I think to myself, “This is exactly the kind of place I would like to live.” It is simple, appears small, and would be quite cheap.
I enter the building and go upstairs. There is a balcony that looks out on a very plush garden, located across the street. There are people there, lounging around a pool. It is very lovely but inaccessible. I jump from one balcony to another, but there is no way to get to the garden. I think to myself, “Rich people and their gardens!” I am not necessarily critical, simply aware.
At the top of the stairs is a hallway on which there is a door to an apartment. In an alcove to the left of the door is a refrigerator. I think, “I could use a Coke,” so I look in the refrigerator, but there is nothing except empty cartons.
The door to the apartment is unlocked, so I enter and look around. It is modest but nice. I notice a phone on a table and think about using it to call my wife. But then I become aware that someone might live here, and I think how frightened they would be if they heard my voice. I look down a hallway to what I presume is a bedroom, but I see no one.
Nevertheless, I quietly step outside the door, close it, and knock! I will ask to use the phone if anyone comes to the door. I cannot seem to knock loudly enough. I look for something to use to make a louder noise, and, while I try a few objects, nothing seems to rouse anyone.
Then I notice a cat in the hall. It is playing with a toy, so I join in the game. As I toss the toy to the cat, the animal seems to get quite ferocious with it, shaking it (as cats do their prey) and mauling it. It comes to shreds. I think, “If that cat wanted to, it could probably hurt me.” I continue playing with the cat, and, while not frightened, I am cautious. End of dream.
Reflection
There are many details in this dream, but there seem to be two broad themes. One is leavetaking; the other is searching and exploring. I exit one place, and seek entry at another.
The crowded house -- with its grazing, singing, bodily movements, and toasting -- brings to mind something I have known about myself for a while but which was brought home with emphasis when I went through a two-day program at a career development center. I tend to take my cues from others; I seem not to have discovered my own inner guide. I don’t know what I think or even what I feel; I need someone else to tell me.
So, there I am in the dream, going through the motions, imitating someone else, wondering how I appear and feeling quite inadequate. Then I leave! I do not have a clean vessel with which to join in the toast, and I don’t like the place anyway. So, I leave. This seems uncharacteristic of me and, therefore, somewhat praiseworthy.
Does this mean that I am to leave my present post? I don’t know. It may mean simply that I am ready to stop looking to others for approval and make up my own mind.
What about the modest upstairs apartment? It is inviting to me. It is secluded and not extravagant, and I feel comfortable there. But it is not mine. I enter it and then realize that I am trespassing. Even though I knock to get in, my knocking is ineffectual and doesn’t rouse anyone. This is not the place for me.
What does this mean? that I am not yet ready for a move? I don’t know. It may mean simply that I am in-between; I haven’t yet found where I belong. There is still the search for the Star and my wife. I haven’t found them yet. Perhaps I am being distracted from the real search I have before me. What I am looking for (my wife, the Star) is not to be found in this city apartment. Maybe the real journey lies within.
And what about the cat? It carries both playfulness and the prospect of danger. I do not feel threatened by it but cautious. Maybe I am being shown that, while there are potentially dangerous forces, they are manageable.
Note: It has taken about an hour (8:45 - 9:45 a.m.) to record and reflect on this dream.
|
|
|
| |
| A New Year |
| 01.02.06 (10:12 pm) [edit] |
|
Monday, January 2, 2006
Here it is, the beginning of a new year. I would really like to make strides this year in the area of personal growth, and I have gotten off to a pretty good start. Yesterday, January 1, I read in its entirety the book by Robert A. Johnson entitled Lying with the Heavenly Woman. I also started Transformations and then finished it today. After that, I began working on his volume entitled Owning Your Own Shadow. I am not quite through it yet. Johnson is a Jungian analyst, and I find Jung's theory of individuation promising for my own journey.
I don't really know what I expect. I am plagued by a pervasive, low-grade anxiety, and I feel that too much of my life has passed for me to be at the point of growth at which I find myself. So...we'll see.
|
|
|
| |
| What 's Your Situation? |
| 12.19.05 (8:26 am) [edit] |
Luke 1:5-25 (NIV)
This passage begins, “In the time of Herod, king of Judea...” (v. 5). When you think about it, that is all times. There has never been a moment when “Herod” was not on the throne. The dominant forces that limit our lives may go by other names, but their presence is a constant. And they limit us. They constrict our possibilities.
Barrenness is the same way. When Luke says of Zechariah’s wife, Elizabeth, that she “was barren” (v. 7), I can identify. I am not a woman, but I know the pain of being ineffectual.
Constriction. Limitation. These are human conditions. They make up our situation. Herod on the throne, barrenness: These are universal. When Elizabeth speaks in verse 25, she says, “In these days....” We know these days. They are the days of powerlessness in which we seem to have no control over our lives.
But helplessness is not the only constant in our situation. God is also present. We know that, but at the same time we don’t know it. Do you understand? We acknowledge it in ways similar to those of the “assembled worshipers [who were] praying outside” the temple while Zechariah went through the prescribed rituals within (v. 10). There is nothing wrong with this; on the contrary, we are wise to position ourselves through the “means of grace” (prayer, Scripture, worship, etc.) to receive whatever God may give.
But the fact remains that we are often surprised when God enters even our sacred space. The text says that Zechariah was “startled” by seeing the angel Gabriel, and he “was gripped with fear” (v. 12). So, even the “upright,” even those known for “observing all the Lord’s commandments and regulations” (v. 6), do not expect to meet God intimately.
God is always there, however. Herod may be on the throne. We may suffer from barrenness. But God is always present. Sometimes, however, we have to be shown. That’s the word Elizabeth used. “In these days,” she said of God, “he has shown his favor” (v. 25, emphasis added).
I wonder, would it change me much if I could affirm that God’s favor has been revealed (“shown”) to me? Would I see all the “dis-grace” of my situation (Herod, barrenness) differently? Elizabeth did. “In these days,” she said, “he has shown his favor and taken away my disgrace” (v. 25).
When I am tempted to see only the negative, I welcome reminders like this, that God’s favor is operative in my life. Perhaps you do, too. And isn’t it great when we have it “shown” to us? It may not change our situation, but it certainly changes the way we look at it.
|
|
|
| |
| A New Start |
| 12.17.05 (7:41 am) [edit] |
|
Yesterday, I completed a two-day program with the Southwest Ministry Development Center in Dallas. It was an intense experience, and I was pretty much exhausted by the time I returned home last night. Despite the fatigue, however, I have a restored sense of hope. I learned some things about myself, some of which I liked and some of which I didn't. But I am ready to "own" both sets of characteristics, and I am ready to work on what needs changing.
Sensing a need to ground this feeling of renewed hopefulness, I turned again this morning to lectio divina. Unsure where to start in the pages of Scripture, I simply used one of the readings from the daily lectionary. There is something about this prescribed set of texts that seems to allow for the initiative of the Spirit in addressing me on any given day.
And God did speak to me today! The reading was Zechariah 8:9-17. Its context is one in which the prophet is urging the people to rebuild the temple of God which has lain in ruins for a generation. It occured to me that my task now is to build a habitation for God -- a temple, if you will -- in my heart, a place where God may dwell within.
The text then seemed to speak to me about the qualities of soul that I would need in working on this great project. The words that presented themselves to me were from verse 9: "Let your hands be strong so that the temple may be built" (NIV). Immediately, I saw two soul qualities in this verse, namely, resolve ["let your hands be strong"] and direction ["that the temple may be built"].
The passage as a whole seemed to suggest other qualities. I would need vision, and the vision of the text was to be found in verse 13: "You will be a blessing.
Faith, too, would be needed -- a settled trust that God accomplish in and through me the task to which he was calling me. Verse 12 provided the promise that would fuel my faith: "The seed will grow well, the vine will yield its fruit, the ground will produce its crops, and the heavens will drop their dew. I will give all these things as an inheritance to" you. What more assurance would I need from God than this, that my efforts would prove to be fruitful?
Finally, I would need courage. The Lord said through his prophet to his ancient people, not once but twice, "Do not be afraid" (vv. 13, 15).
As I meditated, I was working with the notion that these are qualities that I need, as though they are lacking. But then I thought, "What if these are qualities that I already have?" So, I affirmed this in my own mind and before the Lord.
In order to rebuild in my own life a holy habitation for God, a place for Spirit to do the great work of transformation in my life, I will draw on these qualities about which God says, "I will give all these things..." (v. 12):
- Direction: "That the temple may be built" (v. 9).
- Resolve: "Let your hands be strong" (v. 9).
- Vision: "You will be a blessing" (v. 13).
- Faith: "I will give all these things..." (v. 12).
- Courage: "Do not be afraid" (vv. 13, 15).
I am excited about this new start. What a great goal it is to think of "building the temple," or, to put it in my own words, to create within a dwelling place for Spirit.
|
|
|
| |
| Dreams |
| 05.04.05 (10:13 am) [edit] |
I had two dreams last night, both of which I can recall vividly.
First Dream
In the first dream, I found myself on an island, presumably a tourist spot. I got word that an aerial attack was impending and that everyone was encouraged to leave the island. The only exit was a highway that was constructed on a narrow isthmus that connected the island to the mainland. As I was driving, I could see that the attack had already begun. Missiles were ripping up portions of the highway before my very eyes. Traffic was backed up, and people were in a state of chaos.
I left my car and tried to make it on foot. I could see assault planes in the air. In an effort to make sure that the enemy did not see me, I clutched the green grass on the far side of the highway embankment. Occasionally, I thought the pilot of a particularly troublesome fighter might have caught sight of me. I couldn’t tell. I simply kept rushing on all fours along the side of the embankment in the direction of the mainland. I was aware of moving more swiftly and more easily than seemed possible, but I was still haunted by the possibility that my attacker had spotted me.
Analysis -- I am not in a safe place; I am stranded and will have a difficult time getting back to where I belong. There is an enemy who seeks to do me harm, and only my speed and agility will save me. I must not let him see me.
For the past year and a half, I have felt an increasing sense of animosity from certain people in the church. Maybe I am feeling that I need to get to safety.
But perhaps the enemy is internal. If I consider the major characters in the dream from an archetypal perspective, there are two: the aggressor and the fugitive. Is there a force of suppressed (repressed) aggression within that threatens to undo me? Is this part of my shadow, a part that I need to recognize and acknowledge, so that it doesn’t destroy me? If I keep hiding from it, I may be setting myself up for the fear that it will get me yet.
Second Dream
In the second dream, I was in the office at the church. The new puppy that our family has adopted was there, but I had lost track of her. I had just come out of Jim’s office [Jim is our Associate Pastor] and wondered if the puppy had followed me in there. I knocked on the door and entered. In the short time since I had left Jim, he had packed up most of his books. I asked him what he was doing, moving? He said, “I’m finished,” and, walking toward the door, thinking that he was about to say, “I’m finished here,” I said it: “I’m finished here, too.” Then I had an uneasy feeling that that is not what he meant and that I had revealed my feeling that my time in this church was coming to an end. As I walked out the door, I saw the puppy outside Jim’s office.
Analysis -- In this dream, I am looking for something that I have lost, something for which I am responsible, namely, the puppy. I think that it may be in one place, Jim’s office, but it turns out that it is not. It is actually outside Jim’s office.
The dream may have been occasioned by a visit I made to Jim’s office yesterday. He had said that one of our church’s students had been in earlier and had offered to arrange things in a neater way. Maybe that exchanged prompted my dream about Jim packing things up for a move. (He and I have both talked about leaving this church.)
Could it be that Jim’s office represents a move, and what I am looking for cannot be found there (in a move)?
|
|
|
| |
| Broken Wing |
| 01.16.05 (3:16 pm) [edit] |
I have been "grounded" for some six weeks now. On December 4, I fell from a ladder and sustained a fracture to my right elbow. The morning following the surgeon inserted two pins and some wire to hold the bone fragments in place as they healed. I have been doing physical therapy three times a week now for about four weeks.
I have been disinclined to blog during this time. I'm simply glad that I still have an account with tblog. I thought I should write something so that they would keep me current.
Thanks, Ignatius
|
|
|
| |
| Will You Take Christmas with You? |
| 12.15.04 (6:30 pm) [edit] |
|
Matthew 1:18-25 (NIV)
We all know the story of Joseph. We know the drudgery of the trip from Nazareth to Bethlehem with a pregnant woman and one beast of burden between them. We know the pitiable circumstance of arriving at the city of Joseph’s ancestry only to find that all the hotels were full and that there was no room in the inn. We know the indignity and yet the rustic charm of the birth of Mary’s baby – not even Joseph’s child – in a stable amid noisy – and, most likely, smelly -- animals.
But these are not the details I want us to focus on tonight. I want us to go back a ways, before all these events. I want us to go back to that crisis moment Joseph faced when he first found out that Mary was pregnant.
His whole world fell apart in that moment. He knew that he could not be the father of the child, and, therefore, someone else would have to be. He knew some other things, too. He knew that he would be considered the topic of everyone’s conversation in the little village of Nazareth and the source of many a laugh among his neighbors. He knew that he would lose everyone’s respect, maybe even their business.
He knew his dreams were over. He and Mary would never have the future of which he had dreamed. He may, in fact, never marry at all. He may be consigned to a life of loneliness and despair.
He could, of course, have a made a public spectacle of Mary. It’s doubtful that anyone would have blamed him, and he might even buy some degree of respect for himself. At the very least, he would show that no one could wrong him and just get away with it.
But he didn’t do that. He could have, but he didn’t. Matthew tells us that he was a good man, and, in his goodness, he decided to handle the whole matter privately. He would call of the engagement, an act which, in those days, was more like having a marriage annulled. And that would be that.
Now, before we go any further, here is one more thing I want you to think about. Joseph had this trip in his future. There was no getting out of it. It was necessitated by imperial decree. Every man – and I mean every man, not every woman – was being required to go to the home of his ancestors to register for a tax to be levied by Rome. Joseph would go. The man next door would go. The man down the street, the one around the corner, the man across town and all the men in the next town – in every town – would have to go. Wherever their ancestors claimed their origin, they would have to make the trip. Apparently, there were many in the lineage of David, because, by the time Joseph got there, every room was taken. Still in all, it was a “must” trip.
Women did not have to go. Women were not taxed. They could go, and, likely, those men who were married took their wives with them. But the women had no cause to go.
Just as well, Joseph must have thought. Mary would not be going anyway, at least, not now. Mary wouldn’t be going anywhere – not with him. That was all over, done with, ruined by Mary’s apparent indiscretion.
Then Joseph had a dream. It was a dream, the Scripture says. And in it an angel appeared to Joseph and told him something outlandish. The child Mary was carrying was not the result of any natural process; he was the Son of God, the Most High. What is more, he would be the promised Savior of the world.
Now, I don’t know how you regard your dreams. Maybe you remember them, maybe you don’t. Maybe you put credence in them, maybe you don’t. But, whatever the case with you, can you put yourself for just a moment in Joseph’s shoes? What is he to do with this dream? Is he to believe it? Is he to disregard it? Consign it to the realm of the fantastic? What is he to make of it?
What about you and the Christmas dreams you have? Doubtless, they don’t occur in your sleep. But you have them. Maybe you don’t call them dreams. Maybe you call them hopes or even yearnings. But there’s something that Christmas has hinted at in your life that promises something. A loss restored. A sin covered. A relationship healed. A future made more sure. A needed boost in fortune. Something. Something that makes even you – the sophisticated, thinking person that you are – want to believe in the magic of Christmas, in its power to change things for the better.
But will you believe? Or, have you been so disappointed by life that you can’t bring yourself to believe that Christmas can make any difference? You’ve become jaded, or, if not, at least skeptical; or, if not that, then perhaps suspicious. Christmas – with all its talk of the eternal breaking into history, with its message of God become man – it leaves you cold. Or, empty. Or, doubtful.
Like Joseph and his dream. Would he dare put any stock in it? Could he bring himself to believe in the stark reality of the daylight what came to him in the misty shadows of fitful sleep? Well might you and I want him to – and hope he was right. It could mean so much.
It could mean that enemies can be reconciled. It could mean that circumstance can be overcome. It could mean that love will triumph. It could mean that peace would reign. It could mean that joy and hope may replace sorrow and despair. It could mean all that and more.
But what will Joseph do with his dream?
Remember the journey he will be required to take? Watch his doorway early on the morning of his departure from Nazareth to go to Bethlehem. Position yourself across the lane, if there is one. Wait nearby so that nothing may block your view. The door is closed now, but presently it will open. It looks as though no one is home, but I promise there is movement inside. Joseph is making the last minute preparations for the trip he cannot refuse. He has to go. The question is, Will he go alone? Or, will he believe the dream and take Mary?
The door is opening. Someone is emerging. What do you see? How many feet step across that threshold into the still morning air to begin the journey? Two or four? It makes all the difference in the world. Watch carefully and see. Does Joseph take Christmas with him after all, or not?
And now, more importantly, will you?
|
|
|
| |
| Daily Readings |
| 10.29.04 (1:25 pm) [edit] |
Daily Readings
Friday, October 29, 2004
Psalm 84:1-12 Nahum 2:13-3:7 Revelation 13:1-10 Luke 12:13-31
The thematic thread that runs through these four passages reveals how powerfully our DESIRES affect our lives. We are shown both nations and individuals who give expression to their desires and live with the consequences. The specific contrast that is set up is that between greed that takes more than it needs, on the one hand, and trust that relies on God to provide for our needs, on the other.
In Luke 12:13-21, the first portion of the Gospel reading, we are introduced to a man who places his confidence in his wealth, which apparently is quite substantial. “You have plenty of good things laid up for many years,” he says to himself. But, of course, he dies in the night a foolish man, foolish because he is one who “stores up things for himself but is not rich toward God” (12:21). Jesus’ point is: “Be on guard against all kinds of greed; a man’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions” (12:15).
Tell ancient Rome that! Its greed is of a different sort. Power is its aim, and, while wealth contributes to its power, the amassing of control over more and more is the preoccupation of this empire of antiquity. In service to its grasp for power is the exercise of cruel and oppressive policies. In Revelation 13 John describes Rome as a devouring Beast. He tells us, “The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise his authority” (13:5). In addition, “he was given power to make war against the saints and to conquer them. And he was given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation” (13:7).
This is greed of another sort. It is the amassing of power -- abusive and oppressive power -- by a ruthless empire. Greed, in this case, is played out on a broader plane than the greed of the man Jesus tells about in Luke 12, but the principle is the same. Self-serving, self-aggrandizing pursuit of gain (wealth, power, whatever) has a sinister countenance.
And God judges such motivation. That is why we have the man in Luke 12 having to give account for his life (12:20). And in the Nahum selection (3:1-7) we have God calling a nation to account. He raises up the Babylonians to destroy Nineveh, “the city of blood, full of lies, full of plunder” (3:1). Nineveh (by which is meant the whole of Assyria) is called “the mistress of sorceries,” a description that refers to the entrapping seductiveness of her diplomatic and commercial alliances.
In contrast to the grasp for power and wealth that we see in the rich fool and also in the empires of Assyria and Rome, the readings for today give us Jesus’ words in Luke 12:22-31. This section begins with Jesus saying, “Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat; or about your body, what you will wear” (12:22). He asks us to consider the ravens, whom God feeds, and the lilies, which God adorns in splendor. Just as God takes care of them, he will take care of us. Therefore, instead of preoccupying ourselves with how much we have or can get, we are to “seek his kingdom, and all these things will be given to [us] as well” (12:31).
Psalm 84 provides a view of the person whose DESIRES are healthy: “My soul yearns, even faints, for the courts of the LORD; my heart and my flesh cry out for the living God” (84:2). God honors the desires of such persons. “They go from strength to strength, till each appears before God in Zion” (84:7). In a manner mirroring Jesus’ words that “God feeds” the birds (Luke 12:24), the psalmist says that “even the sparrow has found a home, and the swallow a nest for herself” near the altar of God (Psalm 84:3).
In contrast to the Beast of Revelation 13, which is on the move to devour, as was Assyria some six hundred years earlier (see Nahum 2:12) and, in some ways, the rich fool of Jesus’ parable, we have in Psalm 84 the person of whom it is written, “O LORD Almighty, blessed is the man who trusts in you” (84:12).
We ourselves may entertain DESIRES that do not center in trusting God’s provision. To the extent that we do, we may find ourselves grabbing for more and exhibiting greed. This is the path of destruction, as we can see from the examples of Nineveh and the rich fool.
On the other hand, when we place our trust in God to take care of our needs, we find a level of satisfaction that cannot otherwise be known. When our desire is for him, we need never fear (or, worry) that the supply will run out. There is abundance without measure.
|
|
|
| |
| Caregiver and Warrior in Partnership |
| 10.16.04 (8:07 am) [edit] |
Mon 11
Received a copy of Patricia Adson’s book, Finding Your Own True North.
Tue 12
Began reading Adson’s book.
Wed 13
In reading Adson’s book (Finding Your Own True North), gained a new insight. Professionals who have wounds (“blows struck by others”) are more sensitive, because of the wounds, toward others who are wounded. BUT, if the pro hasn’t experienced healing, he (or she) may “so completely identify with” a client who has been victimized that he keeps the client in a state of dependency. Adson presents a brief vignette of a therapist (Katherine) who empowers her clients by helping them “resurrect their residual strenghths and competencies.” Clients are then able to rewrite their stories. They change from a passive voice, in which they focus on what others have done to them, to an active voice, in which they speak of triumph over adversity. If this doesn’t happen, “clients are in danger of having their lives revolve around the wounds of childhood and never choosing a path of their own.” (See pages 47ff.)
As I read this, I realized something about my preaching. For the past few years, I have been identifying (over-identifying?) with people struggling with their own wounds (some of them self-inflicted, as many of mine are). I have been aware of the fact that I am reluctant to call these folks (and myself) to a higher standard. Have I, perhaps, been “keep[ing] those clients in a state of dependency”? If so, the solution, it would seem, is to work on healing for myself.
Again, when Adson describes the Caregiver archetype, she says that, when it is “the only archetype activated, therapists feel indispensable and clients quickly become too dependent” (p. 50). As I apply this to myself, I can see that I have scripted myself as a Caregiver (with an ally in the Orphan). The danger I face is the shadow side of the Caregiver, where “lurks the misguided martyr who totally sacrifices self for others and in doing so helps neither” (p. 50).
What is needed is the aid of the Warrior archetype. Adson quotes Carol Pearson’s book, The Hero Within, and talks about those who internalize the urge to slay dragons and, instead, declare war on themselves. I think this relates to me. I too quickly assume the blame for things.
|
|
|
| |
| John 12:35-46 |
| 09.17.04 (12:06 pm) [edit] |
35/ Jesus said to them, “The light is with you for a little while longer. Walk while you have the light, so that the darkness may not overtake you. If you walk in the darkness, you do not know where you are going. 36/ While you have the light, believe in the light, so that you may become children of light.
After Jesus had said this, he departed and hid from them. 37/ Although he had performed so many signs in their presence, they did not believe in him. 38/ This was to fulfill the word spoken by the prophet Isaiah: "Lord, who has believed our message, and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?" 39/ And so they could not believe, because Isaiah also said, 40/ "He has blinded their eyes and hardened their heart, so that they might not look with their eyes, and understand with their heart and turn — and I would heal them." 41/ Isaiah said this because he saw his glory and spoke about him. 42/ Nevertheless many, even of the authorities, believed in him. But because of the Pharisees they did not confess it, for fear that they would be put out of the synagogue; 43/ for they loved human glory more than the glory that comes from God.
44/ Then Jesus cried aloud: “Whoever believes in me believes not in me but in him who sent me. 45/ And whoever sees me sees him who sent me. 46/ I have come as light into the world, so that everyone who believes in me should not remain in the darkness.
Have you ever stumbled around in a dark room, trying to find the light switch? It can be hazardous, can’t it? Perhaps there’s a chair out of place, and you strike it as you are moving across the floor. It hurts, and there is a bruise the next day. No fun. Or, it’s so dark in the room that you’re disoriented. You think the switch is right in front of you, but it’s not. It’s to your left or your right. It can be confusing. Even scary. As a pastor, I have had occasion to be at the church late at night when it’s dark and you can’t see. They say, of course, that when one of your senses is diminished, the others compensate and become more acute. I believe it. I hear things in the dark that I don’t hear in the light. And when you’re alone in a big church at night and you hear things, your heart jumps into your throat.
As with so many things, what is true in the physical, material realm is true also in the spiritual. Jesus talks here about walking in the light and contrasts it with walking in the darkness. He is not talking, of course, about being in a dark room, looking for the light switch. He is talking about having our minds darkened so that we do not recognize him for who he is or, conversely, being enlightened so that we see clearly that he is the Savior of the world and the one worthy of our devotion and commitment.
In this passage, Jesus says that he has come into the world as a light, and he talks about three reactions that people have to the light. I would like for us to look at each of these in turn.
I. THOSE WHO WILL NOT BELIEVE
The first response that people make to the light is not to believe. John says in verse 37 that, “although he had performed so many signs in their presence, they did not believe in him.” And then he goes on to say that this was a fulfillment of prophecy. He quotes from Isaiah these words: “Lord, who has believed our message, and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?”
And then John makes a startling statement. He says that those who will not believe do not because they cannot. Quoting again from Isaiah, he writes, “He has blinded their eyes and hardened their heart, so that they might not look with their eyes and understand with their heart and turn -- and I would heal them.”
In other words, some people get so used to the darkness that they prefer it to the light. They cannot believe. It’s as though there’s something inside that prevents them. This is a great mystery, and it’s a hard thing to grasp. The important thing to keep in mind is that, when a person’s heart becomes hardened, it is their responsibility -- not God’s. That’s why we should always keep our hearts supple and pliable in the presence of God.
II. THOSE WHO BELIEVE HALF-HEARTEDLY
But hard hearts aren’t the only problem. Some people believe in Jesus, but they do it half-heartedly. John tells us, beginning in verse 42 that, indeed, some people did believe in Jesus -- even people among the authorities -- “but because of the Pharisees they did not confess it, for fear that they would be put out of the synagogue; for they loved human glory more than the glory that comes from God.”
Interesting situation. Many do not believe. But some do. And some of the ones who do are among the religious leaders. But they can’t say so. Why? Fear. They are afraid of what the other religious leaders will do. They are afraid they might lose their status or even be cast out of their church!
Half-hearted faith is really not very comforting. Someone once said that some people have just enough religion to make them miserable. There’s more to life in Christ than that! Jesus said, “I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full” (John 10:10). Cringing, fearful faith is not life to the full, is it?
III. THOSE WHO BELIEVE WHOLE-HEARTEDLY
So, Jesus calls us to something higher, something better. He calls us to whole hearted faith. “Whoever believes in me,” Jesus says, “believes not in me but in him who sent me. And whoever sees me sees him who sent me. I have come as light into the world, so that everyone who believes in me should not remain in the darkness.”
While some walk in darkness and others walk in the misty realms of dusk-like light, you and I are invited to come all the way out of the darkness into the full sunlight of faith. It’s really only in the unfiltered light that you can see. “Whoever sees me sees him who sent me,” Jesus says. “I have come as light into the world.”
Why sit in darkness? Why try to make our way in the half-light of half-hearted faith. Why, indeed, when we have Jesus, who is the light of the world. Let’s put our faith in him -- and if we believe in him at all, let’s go all the way with it. Let’s believe in him with our whole heart. Then we’ll see that there’s nothing to fear and everything to gain.
|
|
|
| |
| John 11:17-29 |
| 09.09.04 (6:52 am) [edit] |
“...to resolve some issue of human need”
-- Bill Johnson A Story Is a Promise, p. 9
John 11:17-29 (NRSV)
17/When Jesus arrived, he found that Lazarus had already been in the tomb four days. 18/Now Bethany was near Jerusalem, some two miles away, 19/and many of the Jews had come to Martha and Mary to console them about their brother. 20/When Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went and met him, while Mary stayed at home. 21/Martha said to Jesus, "Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died. 22/But even now I know that God will give you whatever you ask of him." 23/Jesus said to her, "Your brother will rise again." 24/Martha said to him, "I know that he will rise again in the resurrection on the last day." 25/Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life. Those who believe in me, even though they die, will live, 26/and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?" 27/She said to him, "Yes, Lord, I believe that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, the one coming into the world."
28/When she had said this, she went back and called her sister Mary, and told her privately, "The Teacher is here and is calling for you." 29/And when she heard it, she got up quickly and went to him.
The first question I would ask of this text, I suppose is, who is the character “through whose eyes the story is experienced” (Melanie Ann Phillips). That, of course, would be Martha. She is the grieving sister of Lazarus, who is now dead, and has been for “four days” (11:17). When she hears that Jesus has arrived in Bethany, she goes out to meet him, while her sister, Mary, stays at home. She also interacts with Jesus and, through her interaction, comes to a resolution (or, at least, a near resolution) to her greatest need.
That is the next question I would ask. What is the human need that is addressed in this account? It is the need for consolation. But it is more than that. We are told that “many of the Jews had come to Martha and Mary to console them about their brother” (11:19), but the efforts of these would-be caregivers do not seem to have accomplished much. In fact, the way verse 19 is placed in the text, it almost suggests that Martha walked right through the well-intentioned mourners, ignoring them altogether, to get to Jesus, who had just arrived. She seemed to know -- or, at least, to intuit, that he alone would be able to meet her need. So, it was not simply consolation she sought but lasting, substantial comfort -- and hope.
What opposes Martha in her search for hope? There seem to be both external and internal factors that set themselves in opposition to her. The external obstacle is the raw fact of her brother’s lifeless corpse. It has “already been in the tomb four days” (11:17), and, as Martha says later to Jesus about the body, “Lord, there is already a stench” (11:39). Not only is the body of Lazarus lifeless; it is also decaying.
The internal obstacle to Martha’s hope is a conventional but inadequate belief system. When Jesus tells Martha that her brother “will rise again” (11:23), her reply is almost rote, as though she were quoting some official catechism: “I know that he will rise again in the resurrection on the last day” (11:24).
But the question is, Can she believe more than this? Hope depends on it, although at this point she may not know what more she could believe.
Then it becomes clear to her. Jesus says, “I am the resurrection and the life. Those who believe in me, even though they die, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die” (11:26). Then comes the critical question: “Do you believe this?”
Does she? She has known Jesus for some time. He has been in her home on many an occasion. She even says to him at one point, “I know that God will give you whatever you ask of him” (11:22). She ignores all the other well-wishers when she hears that Jesus has come and goes directly to him.
But Jesus’ claim is one of grand proportions. “I am the resurrection and the life...everyone who lives and believes in me will never die”? Can she believe this? It is certainly beyond what she has ever been taught before to believe, and there is the incontrovertible fact of her brother’s corpse. Does she believe what Jesus claims?
Yes.
She says as much in verse 27: “Yes, Lord, I believe that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, the one coming into the world.”
And this is the foundation of her hope. She has yet to see the full implication of this embryonic faith, as the remainder of chapter 11 will make clear. But there is hope now. Hope that had not been there before. And it is fully vested in Jesus.
Martha shows this by finding her sister Mary and telling her, “The teacher is here and is calling for you.” Jesus’ presence is what Mary has been waiting for as well. She gets up quickly and goes to him.
The story of the events that day in Bethany is not yet over, but an important moment has registered itself forever in the mind and heart of Martha. She has declared her faith, and it has restored her hope.
September 9, 2004
|
|
|
| |
| John 10:31-42 |
| 09.08.04 (3:15 pm) [edit] |
What is the human need in this passage that pleads for resolution?
The particular need in John 10:31-42 has to do with discernment. Jesus concludes his defense of himself by saying, “Even though you may not believe me, believe the works [that I do]....” Why? “So that you may know and understand that the Father is in me and I am in the Father” (10:38). This purpose clause [“so that you may know and understand”] carries the need, which I am identifying as discernment. Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1996) defines discernment as “the power or faculty of the mind by which it distinguishes one thing from another; the power of viewing differences in objects, and their relations and tendencies; penetrative and discriminate mental vision; acuteness; sagacity; insight.” The term is derived from the Latin discernere, to separate: dis-, apart, + cernere, to perceive. The two main Greek words translated as "discernment" are anakrino, meaning to examine or judge closely, and diakrino, to separate out, to investigate, to examine. Discernment is a need because, without the power to distinguish one thing from another, we may place ourselves in danger. I may mistake an enemy for a friend or a lie for the truth. None of us wants to be injured or deceived. We want, rather, to perceive what is true and good. George Hendry states regarding discernment, “We have to discriminate between what is true and what is false, ...between what is primary and what is secondary, between what is central and what is peripheral” [The Holy Spirit in Christian Theology, p. 13].
We may, however, fail to make distinctions. We may misperceive, as did the religious leaders in this account.
|
|
|
| |
| August 23, 2004, Readings |
| 08.23.04 (12:44 pm) [edit] |
DAILY OFFICE August 23, 2004
The Lections [NRSV] for Monday, August 23:
Job 4:1; 5:1-11, 17-21, 26-27 Psalm 57:1-11 Acts 9:10b-31 John 6:52-59
A PATH TO SAFETY
A recurring image in these texts is that of eating. The psalmist writes, “I lie down among lions that greedily devour human prey; their teeth are spears and arrows, their tongues sharp swords” (Ps. 57:4 [NRSV], emphasis added). In Job, chapter 5, Eliphaz the Temanite says with regard to fools that “the hungry eat their harvest” (verse 5 [NRSV], emphasis added). Even the Gospel reading uses the imagery, employing the term “eat” some seven times.
We talk about ours being “a dog-eat-dog world,” and we sometimes think of being “eaten up” with some emotion or obsession. The “lions” in our lives that threaten us are represented sometimes by the hostility with which others seek to “consume” us (Job 5:5, NIV). At times, of course, we may feel that God himself is coming against us, and, when this happens, it is more likely than not that what is being “consumed” is the “dross” (or impurities) in our lives, as the great hymn in John Rippon’s Selection has it: “I only design thy dross to consume and thy gold to refine.”
Generally speaking, we all experience times of trouble, and we scramble for “refuge” of some sort from “the destroying storms” (Psalm 57:1). As Eliphaz says to Job, “Human beings are born to trouble just as sparks fly upward” (Job 5:7). What then are we to do? Taken together, the lections before us today provide a path to safety in the face of distress. Rather than being devoured by the dangers that beset us, we can be delivered. As the psalmist writes of God, “He will send from heaven and save me” (Ps. 57:3). Here then are the steps along the path to deliverance:
I. AVOID THE PIT-FALLS
Any path has potentially dangerous stretches, snares along the way, the “pit in my path” of which the psalmist writes (Ps. 57:6). When life’s “lions” are in pursuit, “greedily” seeking to devour us, we want to avoid the pit-falls. In the readings for today, we may identify at least three:
1. Avoid Falling into Sin
The first misstep could be falling into to sin, and we will want to avoid that. When we are under stress, particularly when it is imposed upon us from others, we may easily react in sinful ways. In Job, chapter 5, Eliphaz tells Job that “vexation kills the fool, and jealousy slays the simple” (verse 2, NRSV). The warning is clearer to me in the NIV: “Resentment kills a fool, and envy slays the simple.” Resentment toward others (or even toward God) and envy of those who have more power or less trouble are destructive reactions. If you think about resentment and envy as being an alternate path to go down, you will find that it leads to bitterness and self-destruction. Each of these choices “kill” or “slay” (Job 5:2) the one who is foolish enough (the “fool” and the “simple” person of Job 5) to resort to them.
2. Avoid Fearing Others
The second reaction we will want to avoid is fearing others; it, too, is a pit-fall. It is not that others may not threaten us. The psalmist talks about his adversaries as “those who trample” him (Ps. 57:3). “Their teeth are spears and arrows, their tongues sharp swords” (Ps. 57:4). “They set a net for my steps.... They dug a pit in my path” (Ps. 57:6). Likewise, Saul (or, Paul, as he came to be known) was in danger. “The Jews plotted to kill him.... They were watching the gates [of Damascus] day and night so that they might kill him” (Acts 9:23f.).
I don’t suppose we should ever be naive about the dangers others may pose. Even Saul’s friends “took him by night and let him down through an opening in the wall, lowering him in a basket” (Acts 9:25). They were realistic rather than presumptious about the hazards. In the same way, we should be alert and cautious. But we should not fear others. Instead, we are to rely upon God. More about that in a moment.
3. Avoid Failing to Learn
A third pit-fall is failing to learn, and, along with falling into sin and fearing others, we will want to avoid it as well. Sometimes our adversities are a reflection of God’s discipline, and we will want to learn from them. Eliphaz reminds us what Scripture teaches throughout when he says, “How happy is the one whom God reproves; therefore do not despise the discipline of the Almighty. For he wounds, but he binds up; eh strikes, but his hands heal” (Job 5:17f.). Proverbs 3:11-12 contain the same wisdom: “My son, do not despise the Lord’s discipline and do not resent his rebuke, because the Lord disciplines those he loves, as a father the son he delights in” (NIV; see also Hebrews 10:5f.).
On the path that leads to refuge, we will want to avoid such pit-falls as those that have been identified in the readings for today. Falling into sin, fearing others, and failing to learn from our difficulties: these are all hazards of which we should be aware.
II. APPEAL TO GOD
So, now we know what not to do. What is it that we should do? We should appeal to God. This is exactly what Psalm 57 rehearses for us, when it says, “Be merciful to me, O God, be merciful to me, for in you my soul takes refuge; in the shadow of your wings I will take refuge, until the destroying storms pass by. I cry to God Most High.... He will send from heaven and save me.... God will send forth his steadfast love and his faithfulness” (Ps. 57:1-3a, c).
Eliphaz says, “As for me, I would seek God, and to him I would commit my cause” (Job 5:8). This is what I am to do, remembering how the psalmist reminds us that it is “God who fulfills his purpose for me” (Ps. 57:2). And that is what it is important for all of us to remember. God has a purpose for us, and he will fulfill it in his time. As David wrote in Psalm 27, “The Lord is my light and my salvation -- whom shall I fear? The Lord is the stronghold of my life -- of whom shall I be afraid” (verse 1, NIV).
III. ABIDE IN CHRIST
The path to take in the times of trouble, when life (and, sometimes, the people or circumstances in it) threatens to devour us, is the path of deliverance, in which we appeal to God and rely on him for refuge. It’s destination is a beautiful place which we may reach when we take the third step along the way: Abide in Christ.
To understand the importance of abiding in Christ, let’s focus on the Gospel reading for today. In John 6:52-59, we find Jesus teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum, and we hear him using figurative language, as teachers often do, to make a point. He is using analogy. Nothing is more vital to maintaing life than eating and drinking. And so, he says, “Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you” (John 6:53). You can see that, if you take such words literally, you will be put off. But Jesus does not expect us to be literal about this. Even when we eat the bread of communion and drink the wine, we understand that we are participating in a symbolic ritual. What, then, is Jesus getting at?
Sometimes in his writing John uses what scholars call a chiastic structure. That is, ideas are arranged in parallel fashion to emphasize the meaning he wants to convey. (Other writers do this, too.) Usually, the first and last concepts will be parallel, the second and the next-to-last will be parallel, and so forth, until you find the central idea where you would expect to find it -- right in the middle. Let’s take a look at John 6:52-59 and see how John does this. It is easier to see than it is to explain, so take a look at this layout:
a The Jews disputed among themselves (verse 52)
b Unless you eat...drink, you have no life (verse 53)
c Those who eat...drink have eternal life (verses 54f.)
THOSE WHO EAT AND DRINK ABIDE IN ME (verse 56)
c1 Whoever eats me will live (verse 57)
b1 Unlike that which your ancestors ate and died (verse 58)
a1 He said these things while he was teaching (verse 59)
The central idea, then, is abiding in Jesus. That’s where the life is. That is also where the refuge in time of trouble is. It is what Acts 9:31 describes as “living in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit.” It is when we abide in Christ that we can say with the psalmist, “My heart is steadfast, O God, my heart is steadfast” (Ps. 57:7).
Conclusion
When life comes against us to devour us, we naturally seek refuge. We don’t want to take the false path that leads only to bitterness and resentment. We want to seek God, make our appeal to him, and arrive at that place where we abide in Christ. We want to take the path that leads to deliverance.
|
|
|
| |
| John 6:16-27 |
| 08.19.04 (9:54 am) [edit] |
John 6:16-27 (NIV)
Our lives take twists and turns that sometimes leave us feeling insecure. When we find ourselves losing balance and in danger of falling, we instinctively grasp for something to hold on to. If we are fortunate, our grip will take hold of some strong and stable object. If we are less fortunate, we may grab something that gives way and allows us to fall despite our efforts. What we depend on in life is that way. We need to make sure that we rely on that which is reliable, that we place our trust in that which is trustworthy, that we build our lives on that which endures.
Sometimes, when we go to the store to buy meat, we look for a sticker that says, “FDA Approved.” This seal of approval is our assurance that this is quality meat. It is safe to eat. We have our government’s word on it.
Jesus says in verse 27, “Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. On him God the Father has placed his seal of approval.” When it comes to the food that Jesus gives us -- that which “endures to eternal life” -- we have the comfort of knowing that this food is all that it claims to be. It has God’s seal of approval.
Why is it important to put our confidence only in what “endures to eternal life?” We have the answer right here before us in this passage from John, chapter 6. We trust in the enduring faithfulness of Jesus Christ...
I. Because It Will Secure Us IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST MENACING CIRCUMSTANCES (6:16-21)
The disciples had observed the power of Jesus as he fed the multitudes with but a few loaves and fishes (John 6:1-13). Jesus had then gone up on a mountain to be alone, and the disciples had taken a boat to row across the Sea of Galilee to Capernaum. As they made their way across this unpredictable body of water, they experienced three setbacks. Verse 17 says that “by now it was dark.” Verse 18 adds even more frightening elements when it says, “A strong wind was blowing and the waters grew rough.” These are menacing circumstances.
We all face them. We even talk about them, using the language we find here in John, chapter 6. We might say something like, “That was a dark time for me,” or, “The wind was against me,” or even, “I was in some pretty rough waters.” Circumstance sometimes threaten to undo us. We are overwhelmed and tossed about by things beyond our control. We may even be fatigued, as Jesus disciples no doubt were. John says that they had been rowing -- rowing, mind you -- for “three or three and a half miles” (verse 19). That alone would tire you out, not to mention that they were trying to make their way through some very uncooperative waves.
It was at their darkest moment, however, that Jesus came to them. They did not recognize him at first. John says that, when “they saw Jesus approaching the boat, walking on the water..., they were terrified” (verse 19). When I read this, I couldn’t help but think that, sometimes, when my life is in turmoil, God comes to me to help me, but I do not recognize him. His approach may actually be hidden in some event or incident that terrifies me. But it turns out that he is in it after all, and what I see at first as a threat is actually revealed to be a blessing.
That’s certainly how it was for these disciples. Of course, when Jesus identified himself, they were able to see things more clearly. “It is I,” he said; “don’t be afraid” (verse 20). “Then,” John says, “they were willing to take him into the boat” (verse 21). The same things happens to us, doesn’t it?
A difficult situation arises like a violent wind at sea. Perhaps it is something between you and another person -- a friend, a co-worker, a spouse, whatever. And you must do something: ask forgiveness, offer to forgive, take the first step toward reconciliation. The prospect of taking such a step seems more like a specter of sorts, a frightening, threatening thing, than it does the doorway to grace. But when you recognize that the Lord is in it -- “It is I; don’t be afraid” -- you welcome it. And, like the disciples in John’s account, you “immediately” reach “the shore” and safety.
II. Because It Will Sustain Us IN THE SEARCH FOR MEANINGFUL CONNECTIONS (6:22-27)
So, we ought to trust in the enduring faithfulness of Jesus Christ because, for one thing, it will secure us in the struggle against menacing circumstances. And we ought to trust in the enduring faithfulness of Jesus Christ, secondly, because it will sustain us in the search for meaningful connections.
What do I mean by that? In John’s account, the disciples are safely ashore on the other side of the lake. But the crowds that had been following Jesus are still where Jesus left them. The sun comes up; the people get up. And they don’t see Jesus. They know that he did not leave with his disciples, but they also knew that he wasn’t here. Where was he?
Some boats had arrived from Tiberius, and were apparently about to set out for Capernaum. So, the people got aboard and, as John tells us, “went to Capernaum in search of Jesus” (verse 24).
Why search for Jesus? Because, in him, they had begun to find what I am calling meaningful connections. Their lives were beginning to make sense. They didn’t understand him or his mission fully, but they understood enough of it to know that they wanted to understand it better. They felt cared for when they were with him. They felt close to God when they were with him. They felt that life was purposeful and promising when they were with him. Who, then, wouldn’t want to be with him? So they went searching.
Searching for How
Of course, when they found Jesus, they were curious about how he got to Capernaum. He hadn’t left with his disciples. The people knew that. He hadn’t been among them when they made the trip. They knew that. There hadn’t been any other boats. They knew that, too. So, how did he do it?
Jesus cautioned them. The meaning for which they were searching would not be found so much in asking, “How?” It was more likely to be found in asking, “Why?” and “Who?”
Searching for Why
Why did Jesus do the things he did? That was the right question. And, who was he? That was an even better question. “I tell you the truth,” Jesus said, “you are looking for me not because you saw miraculous signs but because you ate the loaves and had your fill.” You see -- don’t you? -- that Jesus is pressing the why question. “Why are you seeking me? Is it because in me you catch a glimpse of the eternal? Or, is it because you see in me ways to make the temporal more tolerable?” Why?
Why do we seek Jesus? Is our search centered in making the temporal more convenient, or is it centered in making the eternal more evident? If it is the latter -- if our search is focused on eternal values -- it is likely to make the temporal less easy and more messy. Like the choppy waters of the Sea of Galilee in one of its unpredictable storms. But we have already seen that our safety, even in the midst of the storm, is found in Jesus.
Searching for Who
That brings us from why to who. Who is Jesus? This is the central question of the whole Gospel. And in the answer to that question is to be found the meaning of human life. Everything “connects” when we can answer that question satisfactorily.
And Jesus gives us the answer. “Do not work,” he says, “for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. On him God the Father has placed his seal of approval” (verse 27). Jesus, then, is the One of whom the Father approves. He is the One who gives eternal life. He is the One we can trust. He is the One who gives us food, and we never go hungry again.
Whether we are struggling against menacing circumstance or simply seeking meaningful connections in our lives, the One who will sustain and secure us is none other than Jesus. Doesn’t it make sense, then, to place our trust in him? When we do, we will discover that what he gives us will last. It will endure and endure. Because what he gives us is eternity.
|
|
|
| |
| John 6:1-15 |
| 08.19.04 (8:04 am) [edit] |
John 6:1-15 (NIV)
This passage helps us to understand some of what is involved in being a disciple of Jesus. It suggests to me that a disciple...
I. Discovers the Mind of Jesus (6:1-4)
Great crowds were following Jesus, but, before he turned his attention to them, he turned his attention to his disciples. Verse 3 says, “Then Jesus went up on a mountainside and sat down with his disciples.” If I want to follow Jesus and participate in the ministry he is doing, I need to sit with him a while. It is in the time alone with Jesus that I discover his mind; that is, I learn to think as he thinks.
II. Determines the Way of Jesus (6:5-9)
A. By Addressing Needs (verses 5-7)
Jesus was equipping his disciples for ministry. He was teaching them how to bring the resources of God to the needs of people. So, when he saw the opportunity for ministry (“a great crowd coming toward him”), he asked one of his disciples, Philip, “Where shall we buy bread for these people to eat?” This may be a question none of the disciples would have entertained on their own. So, Jesus is teaching them his way. Be observant. Address needs. Equip others to help.
B. By Allocating Resources (verses 8-9)
Andrew, another of the disciples, seems to be a quick learner. He is aware of a resource that may help. “Here is a boy with five small barley loaves and two small fish...” (verse 9). But even Andrew has yet to learn something. He thinks the resources may be too little. But Jesus is about to take them to the next level, where whatever you have, if offered in love, is enough.
III. Demonstrates the Love of Jesus (5:10-13)
Jesus’ love gets expressed in a very practical way in this incident. Hungry people are fed. Jesus shows his disciples how to put love into practice as he organizes the people, gives thanks, has his disciples distribute the loaves, and then has them gather up the leftovers. As we will see in the next passage (John 5:16-27), these people go to great lengths to be around Jesus. Why? Because they feel his love for them. They may not understand who he is, but they do understand that he cares about them. This is an important lesson in discipleship.
IV. Discerns the Heart of Jesus (5:14-15)
As is often the case, those who are helped do not understand the heart of the one helping. This happens in this episode. The people miss the point, and John says in verse 15, “Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him a king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself.” Jesus does not intend to settle for an earthly kingdom; his kingdom is in the hearts of his people. Disciples discern this, and they comply with it.
|
|
|
| |
| John 5:30-47 |
| 08.18.04 (7:31 am) [edit] |
John 5:30-47 (RSV)
How can we believe that Jesus is sent from the Father? By weighing the evidence:
I. Evidence in Support (5:30-40)
1. Jesus’ Testimony (5:30-32) 2. John’s Testimony (5:33-35) 3. Weightier Testimony (5:36-40)
a. Testimony of Jesus’ Work (verse 36) b. Testimony of Jesus’ Father (verses 37-38) c. Testimony of the Scriptures (verses 39-40)
II. Evidence Not in Support (5:41-47)
1. Receiving It (5:41-44) 2. Results From It (5:45-47)
|
|
|
| |
| John 5:19-29 (RSV) |
| 08.16.04 (8:58 am) [edit] |
John 5:19-29 (RSV)
The theme of this text has to do with honoring Jesus as the Son of God. Jesus says in verse 23 that the Father has taken certain steps so “that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father.” He goes on to say in the same verse, “He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him.”
Jesus gives us two reasons that we are to honor him as the Son of the Father:
I. The Father Has Given Him the Privilege to Judge (5:19-24).
* “The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son” (5:22).
* This has significance for the Present: “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears my word and believes him who sent me, has eternal life; he does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life” (5:24).
II. The Father Has Given Him the Power to Judge (5:25-29).
* “...The Father...has given him authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of man” (5:26, 27).
* This has significance for the Future: “Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear hear his voice and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment” (5:28-29).
|
|
|
| |
| John 5:1-15 |
| 08.14.04 (9:11 am) [edit] |
|
In this account, we are told that Jesus returns again to Jerusalem, where there is a pool called Bethesda. There is a man there, an "invalid" (verse 5), who has been waiting thirty-eight years to be healed. Jesus approaches the man and asks him, "Do you want to get well?" From that point on, we get a picture of what this man is like, a picture that may help us determine where some changes need to take place in our own lives.
This man...
I. Perceives himself to be helpless (5:1-9a).
& nbsp; When Jesus asks him, "Do you want to get well?" the man immediately begins to make excuses. "'Sir,' the invalid replied, 'I have no one to help me into the pool when the water is stirred. While I am trying to get in, someone else goes down ahead of me'" (5:7).
& nbsp; This man fails in this instance to be responsible. I may at times forfeit a full life because of my failure to be responsible. Denial, blame, rationalization, and minimization are ways of avoiding responsibility.
II. Presents himself to be clueless (5:9b-13)
& nbsp; Jesus heals this man, and the man is walking around in public, carrying his mat. Some religious authorities see him doing this and become upset because it is the Sabbath and the law forbids people from carrying much of anything, including their mats. The authorities confront this man, and he tells them that he was instructed to carry his mat. "Who is this fellow who told you" to do this, the authorities asked. Of course, he doesn't know. John writes, "The man who was healed had no idea who it was" (5:13). He is clueless about the law. He is clueless about Jesus.
& nbsp; This man fails in this instance to be mindful. Being ignorant of things I need to know is a fault I can sometimes fall into.
III. Permits himself to be careless (5:14-15)
& nbsp; Jesus finds the man and urges him to accept some responsibility for his life. "See, you are well again. Stop sinning or something worse may happen to you" (5:14).
& nbsp; Something worse does happen. He carelessly fingers the one man who has been his benefactor. He identifies Jesus to the hostile authorities.
& nbsp; This man fails in this instance to be loyal. I, too, sometimes fail to exhibit loyalty to those who have earned it.
& nbsp; This passage highlights three virtures by showing us their opposites. Relying on God's grace, we need to develop...
responsibility
mindfulness
loyalty
|
|
|
| |
|
|